Skip to main content
Forms comparison
3 forms compared

Fish oil vs krill vs algal · which to choose

3 main sources · differences in bioavailability, sustainability and chemical form (TG · EE · PL · rTG). Chemical form matters more than origin.

1

Fish oil · TG/rTG

Triglycerides · natural or re-esterified

Best for

Ideal use: 90% of cases · gold standard price-efficacy.

Advantages

Best human bioavailability (TG = natural form in fish). rTG is TG re-esterified after EPA/DHA concentration · same bioavailability. Reasonable cost. Third-party analysis verifies contaminants.

Disadvantages

Marine origin · sustainability if not MSC/IFOS sourced. Mild fish taste if oxidized.

2

Krill · phospholipid

Phosphatidylcholine + astaxanthin

Best for

Ideal use: APOE4 carriers, specific cognitive function, ample budget.

Advantages

PL transports omega-3 directly to brain · advantage in APOE4 carriers (DHA crosses BBB better). Endogenous astaxanthin. Lower dose for same Index.

Disadvantages

Expensive · 2-3× fish oil price. Low EPA+DHA concentration per capsule (need 4-6 caps).

3

Algal · vegan DHA

Microalgae oil (Schizochytrium)

Best for

Ideal use: vegetarians · vegans · shellfish allergies · pregnancy with contamination concerns.

Advantages

Vegan · sustainable · no marine contaminants. Pure DHA (some varieties include EPA). Same Omega-3 Index elevation as fish.

Disadvantages

More expensive than fish oil. Low EPA in many formulations (DHA dominant). Neutral taste.

Which form for your goal?

Fish oil · TG/rTG

Ideal use: 90% of cases · gold standard price-efficacy.

Krill · phospholipid

Ideal use: APOE4 carriers, specific cognitive function, ample budget.

Algal · vegan DHA

Ideal use: vegetarians · vegans · shellfish allergies · pregnancy with contamination concerns.

3 main sources · differences in bioavailability, sustainability and chemical form (TG · EE · PL · rTG). Chemical form matters more than origin.