Skip to main content
Forms comparison
3 forms compared

Phytosome vs EMIQ vs Crystalline · which to choose

3 forms with radically different bioavailability · crystalline is marketing if you want clinical effects · phytosome or EMIQ is mandatory.

1

Quercefit® phytosome (Indena)

Patented phosphatidylcholine phytosome

Best for

Ideal use: DQ+F senolytic stack protocol, COVID prophylaxis, endothelial FMD.

Advantages

Bioavailability ~20x crystalline (Riva 2019). Form used in Di Pierro COVID RCT + Mayo senolytic. Standardized 250 mg quercetin/capsule.

Disadvantages

Expensive (~25-50 €/month at 500 mg). Only in premium brands paying Indena royalty.

2

EMIQ (enzymatically modified isoquercitrin)

Hayashibara JP · α-glycosyl isoquercitrin

Best for

Ideal use: seasonal allergy, asthma, cross gluten-mast-cell sensitivity.

Advantages

Bioavailability ~17-25x crystalline via glycosyl-conjugate absorbed efficiently. Form used in Yamada 2024 allergy RCT.

Disadvantages

Less availability in Spain · more common JP/USA. Different taste (slightly sweet).

3

Pure crystalline quercetin

Vanilla 95% pure flavonoid

Best for

Ideal use (limited): chronic flavonoid-stack supplement, NOT for senolytic pulse protocol.

Advantages

Economical (~10-20 €/month at 500 mg). Good for concentrated source in flavonoid-rich diet-augmenting stack.

Disadvantages

Oral bioavailability ~1-2% · unlikely to reach senolytic plasma concentrations (~1-10 µM) except impractical doses >3 g/day. For senolytic: insufficient.

Which form for your goal?

Quercefit® phytosome (Indena)

Ideal use: DQ+F senolytic stack protocol, COVID prophylaxis, endothelial FMD.

EMIQ (enzymatically modified isoquercitrin)

Ideal use: seasonal allergy, asthma, cross gluten-mast-cell sensitivity.

Pure crystalline quercetin

Ideal use (limited): chronic flavonoid-stack supplement, NOT for senolytic pulse protocol.

3 forms with radically different bioavailability · crystalline is marketing if you want clinical effects · phytosome or EMIQ is mandatory.